All of this pressure from society, whether benevolent or full

Talk about social media marketing talk
Post Reply
santos
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2023 4:54 am

All of this pressure from society, whether benevolent or full

Post by santos »

Earth system present, develop and improve climate models, increase resources for climate research, and facilitate the exchange of climate data. All these recommendations have been implemented and have made it possible to improve the quantity and detail of the analyzes of past and present climates and projections of the future climate. All these questions are, of course, not resolved (like the quantification of the role of clouds and aerosols) and still require a fundamental research effort.


In the end, the mass of results from the 2010s is much more abundant and quantitative than that of the 1990s. Pressures of all kinds This overweight (but with muscle!) has been accompanied by an increase in societal Phone Number List pressure, which is very gradually becoming aware of climate change and the risks it poses to future generations. This pressure will increase even further if binding standards are put in place in the years to come. This often passionate, sometimes interested, or even defeatist interest in our collective ability to move socio-economic lines has also been "enhanced", it must be said, by the regular attacks of climatosceptism, ailments (especially male d elsewhere, I don't know of any climatosceptism women) mainly from developed countries, including France.

Image

Ulterior motives, has forced the IPCC, and the scientific community more broadly, to be even more rigorous in its reports and methods, and to try to communicate them better. Unfortunately, it is not easy to reconcile these two objectives. Being even more rigorous in the context of the mass of existing results has led to more figures in the summaries for decision makers, with the addition of the implementation of a coordinated restitution of their uncertainties. Thus, in 2010, the IPCC published a very important and yet much less publicized document than the summaries for decision-makers: a methodological guide for a coherent restitution of uncertainties. We find there the origin and the meaning of all the qualifiers present in the summaries for decision makers like “very likely” , “unlikely” or even my favorite: “about as likely as not” , so dear to the Normans. Better communication often requires more simplifications in renderings.
Post Reply